In the summer of 1971, amidst a global landscape marked by evolving social norms and a burgeoning counter-culture, a 15-year-old named Andrew Herrick embarked on a solitary wilderness expedition in Victoria’s central highlands. Driven by a youthful conviction that modern civilization was "meh, and surely doomed," Herrick resolved to attempt a self-sufficient existence off the land. This nine-day venture, initially conceived with two classmates, ultimately became a solo trial of endurance, resourcefulness, and a profound, if challenging, education in the realities of survival. The journey, which saw him navigate remote tracks, ascend Mount Concord, and confront the harsh realities of foraging and hunting, provides a compelling historical snapshot of adolescent idealism clashing with the unforgiving Australian bush.
The Genesis of an Expedition: Disillusionment and Idealism
The early 1970s were a period of significant social upheaval and introspection, particularly among younger generations. Globally, the Vietnam War fueled anti-establishment sentiments, environmental awareness was gaining traction following works like Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, and the "back-to-the-land" movement was inspiring many to seek simpler, more natural ways of living. For a discerning 15-year-old in 1971, these broader societal currents likely converged with personal adolescent development, fostering a critical view of established norms and an adventurous spirit. Herrick’s decision to abandon the comforts of his suburban home for a life in the wilderness was not merely a childish whim but a reflection of a deeper, albeit nascent, philosophical stance. His parents’ "smirking" reaction, as described, likely underscored the perceived naivety of his ambition, yet failed to deter his zeal.
Equipped with what he considered "epic" provisions – a tent, canteen, billy (a traditional Australian cooking pot), sleeping bag, cord, and a meager supply of "emergency rations" including two carrots, a bag of soup mix, and creamed rice – Herrick’s preparation, while earnest, was notably lacking in the practical bushcraft knowledge essential for extended wilderness survival. Curiously, a bushcraft pamphlet was accompanied by a Women’s Weekly cutting of Princess Caroline of Monaco, a juxtaposition that hints at the blend of practical ambition and youthful fantasy underpinning the endeavor.
Initially, Herrick successfully recruited two fellow members from his school’s "geek club," Peter and David, to join his ambitious undertaking. The camaraderie of shared idealism provided a temporary buffer against the daunting task ahead.
A Journey into Victoria’s Untamed Heart
The expedition commenced with the trio navigating what are now described as "now-vanished tracks" through Victoria’s central highlands. This region, characterized by its rugged terrain, dense bushland, and often unpredictable weather, presented an immediate physical challenge. Their destination was Molesworth Station, a historically significant pastoral property in the upper Goulburn Valley, serving as a gateway to the more remote wilderness. From Molesworth, the group ascended Mount Concord, a peak rising 460 metres, to reach their envisioned "nirvana": a grassy flat beside the evocatively named Chrystal Creek, a location Herrick had meticulously identified on a survey map.
The initial leg of the journey, covering significant distances on foot, quickly exposed the participants to the physical rigours of wilderness travel. For teenagers accustomed to sedentary school routines, the unaccustomed exertion on "legs previously exercised exclusively in the school library" proved debilitating.
Day-by-Day Chronology of the Expedition:
- Day 1: The three teenagers, Andrew, Peter, and David, trek through Victoria’s central highlands, reaching Molesworth Station and then ascending Mount Concord to establish their camp beside Chrystal Creek. Spirits are high, fueled by youthful ambition.
- Day 2: Physical toll becomes evident. The demanding trek leaves all three "staggering around in agony," experiencing muscle soreness and exhaustion, a stark contrast to their previous sedentary lifestyles.
- Day 3: The first departure occurs. David, unable to continue, "tapped out" and left the expedition, likely returning to Molesworth or seeking a way home. The group is reduced to two.
- Day 4: Peter, the second companion, also abandons the venture, reportedly calling Andrew an "idiot" before departing. Andrew Herrick is left entirely alone in the wilderness. Despite the solitude, he expresses not loneliness but companionship found in the portrait of Princess Caroline, hung inside his tent, serving as his sole "human face."
- Day 5: Hunger begins to profoundly affect Herrick’s perception and decision-making. He attempts to forage and trap, constructing a crude stick trap baited with a precious carrot. His attempt to capture a rabbit fails, as the animal escapes into the bracken, dashing his hopes for a substantial meal. Later that afternoon, spotting a blackfish in Chrystal Creek, he is overcome by a "hunter’s rush" and attempts to club it, pursuing it into a deep pool where the cunning fish outwits him. Dinner consists of the rabbit-gnawed carrot and a portion of the soup mix.
- Day 6: Herrick spends a significant portion of the day naked, attempting to dry his damp and smoky clothes over a campfire. The subsequent wearing of still-damp, singed clothing highlights the ongoing discomfort and lack of practical knowledge regarding wilderness living. He is unaware of the readily available, nutritious local flora such as witchetties (larvae from acacia trees), cumbungi (bulrush) bulbs, and bracken shoots, which could have provided sustenance.
- Late Day 6: A significant event occurs: Herrick successfully spears a blue-tongue lizard on a granite boulder. This is a moment of triumph, fulfilling a primal hunter instinct. He carries the lizard back to camp, perceiving it as a display of his "status as a hairless-chested hunter," despite having no audience.
- Day 7: The lizard meat is boiled with the remaining soup mix. The resulting broth is described as exuding a thick yellow oil with an "iodine" stench, attributed to the lizard’s last meal of millipedes. Despite the repulsive taste, Herrick consumes some, only to experience severe nausea and retching later that night. This experience highlights the critical importance of understanding wild food preparation. His menu for the day concludes with the last "limp" carrot and half of his creamed rice.
- Day 8: The remaining half of the creamed rice constitutes his only sustenance.
- Day 9: With all provisions exhausted and physical discomfort at its peak (including bothersome midge bites), Herrick descends Mount Concord at dusk. He spends the "roughest night of [his] life" on a slatted bench at Molesworth Station, "itching to catch the morning train home." The expedition concludes with his return to civilization.
The Unyielding Challenges of the Wild
Herrick’s account vividly illustrates the stark realities of attempting to live off the land with inadequate preparation. The physical toll was immediate and severe, quickly dispelling any romantic notions of effortless wilderness living. The departure of his companions underscored the individual nature of such challenges and the differing thresholds of endurance.

Hunger, a constant companion, fundamentally altered Herrick’s perspective. His desperate attempts at foraging and hunting — the crude rabbit trap, the futile pursuit of the blackfish, and the spearing of the blue-tongue lizard — demonstrated a naive understanding of the intricate balance of nature and the skills required for sustainable subsistence. The blackfish, known for its cunning, easily evaded his attack, a humbling encounter that served as an early "hubris reset."
The consumption of the blue-tongue lizard provided a crucial, albeit unpleasant, lesson in food safety. The "iodine" smell and subsequent illness were likely due to toxins from the lizard’s diet or improper preparation, highlighting that even successful hunting does not guarantee safe consumption. Modern bushcraft emphasizes thorough identification, preparation, and cooking techniques to avoid such hazards. For instance, the advice to "always fry lizards in their own skin" suggests a traditional method of rendering fats and sealing in flavors while potentially mitigating some unpleasantries, although thorough cooking remains paramount.
Beyond the physical, the psychological aspect of prolonged solitude in a remote environment cannot be overstated. Herrick’s reliance on the image of Princess Caroline as his sole "human face" speaks volumes about the human need for connection, even symbolic, in isolation. This psychological anchor likely played a role in his ability to endure the solitary days after his companions departed.
Broader Context and Implications
Herrick’s 1971 expedition, while a personal narrative, resonates with broader themes of the era. The "back-to-the-land" movement was gaining momentum, driven by a desire for self-sufficiency, a rejection of consumerism, and a yearning for connection with nature. However, many who attempted such lifestyles quickly realized the immense practical difficulties and the specialized knowledge required. Herrick’s experience serves as a microcosm of this learning curve.
From a contemporary perspective, wilderness survival experts would emphasize several critical areas where Herrick’s expedition was vulnerable:
- Preparation and Knowledge: Lacking detailed knowledge of local flora and fauna for edible identification, proper trapping techniques, and safe food preparation. A comprehensive understanding of the environment is paramount.
- Equipment: While he had basic gear, specialized tools for foraging, fishing, and processing food were absent.
- Physical Conditioning: The initial struggle highlighted the importance of physical fitness for sustained wilderness activity.
- Mental Fortitude: While Herrick demonstrated considerable resilience, the rapid departure of his companions and the psychological impact of hunger and solitude are common challenges that require mental preparation and coping strategies.
- Emergency Planning: The minimal emergency rations and lack of a clear exit strategy (beyond "catching the morning train home" after exhausting all resources) indicate insufficient planning for contingencies.
The story implicitly touches upon Australia’s unique bushcraft traditions, which indigenous populations have practiced for millennia. Had Herrick possessed even rudimentary knowledge of these techniques – identifying witchetties (grubs found in acacia trees, a high-protein food source), preparing cumbungi (bulrush rhizomes, a starchy staple), or understanding the seasonality and preparation of bracken shoots (though some bracken species can be toxic if not properly prepared) – his survival prospects and comfort levels would have been significantly different. The mention of these missed opportunities highlights the vast store of traditional ecological knowledge that was, and often remains, underutilized by those venturing into the Australian bush without guidance.
The Enduring Legacy: Lessons Learned
Despite the hardships and the ultimate retreat from the wilderness, Herrick’s nine-day ordeal provided invaluable life lessons. He later reflected on the "mettle to brave the wild for longer than some tough guys on a certain TV show," an observation that humorously yet truthfully points to the personal resilience he demonstrated. The expedition undoubtedly instilled a deep appreciation for "civilisation’s merits," particularly the readily available food, shelter, and comfort that are often taken for granted.
Perhaps the most profound and lasting lesson was the recognition of perpetual learning. "Most of all, I learned that we always, always, have more to learn. Even at 15." This statement encapsulates the humility gained from confronting nature’s indifference and one’s own limitations. It speaks to the ongoing process of personal growth and the understanding that knowledge, especially in complex domains like wilderness survival, is never fully mastered.
Years later, the experience continued to shape Herrick’s perspective, fostering an enduring need "to seek solace in wild places as a way to understand the place of humans in the world." This suggests that while the initial ambition of living off the land proved unsustainable, the deeper connection to nature and the self-awareness forged in solitude left an indelible mark. The journey was not merely a survival attempt but a formative experience that underscored the intricate relationship between humanity and the natural world, a relationship that continues to inspire and challenge individuals across generations. His youthful experiment in Victoria’s central highlands stands as a powerful reminder of the transformative power of nature and the enduring human quest for understanding, even when undertaken with ambitious, albeit underprepared, zeal.






